GIPS-aligned performance verification for crypto
GIPS-aligned performance verification for crypto asset managers.
The Global Investment Performance Standards exist because emerging managers can't compete on returns alone — unverified claims don't win institutional capital. Assay brings the same credibility infrastructure that hedge funds use in traditional finance to crypto for the first time. Pre-register your benchmark, connect your accounts, and turn your track record into something LPs can trust.
Performance computed by Assay from primary sources — read-only exchange APIs and on-chain wallets, not manager-submitted spreadsheets.
Following the Global Investment Performance Standards as our methodological reference, adapted for digital assets.
Prove your edge without revealing your strategy. Trade-level data is never published, sold, or used to train models.
Managers progress through three explicit tiers with increasing rigor. Each tier uses the same TWR methodology; what differs is the strength of the source guarantees behind the numbers.
Submit your own numbers in a clean tear-sheet format, explicitly labeled as unverified. Useful for emerging managers who want a presentable starting point before full engagement.
Assay verifies returns directly from read-only exchange APIs and on-chain wallets. Trade and transfer history reconstructed; TWR computed per GIPS; external flows netted out.
Full GIPS-aligned engagement: pre-registered benchmark, composite construction, liquidity-adjusted valuation, custody attestation, and continuous wallet-clustering analysis.
Updated daily. Each manager row is paired with its locked-in benchmark in the muted row directly beneath, so you can scan alpha at a glance.
| Manager | 3Y | AUM |
|---|---|---|
| Tessellate MarketsAccount-VerifiedInc. 2022-03 · Switzerland | +41.5% | $31.0M |
| ↳ Ether (ETH) | -36.2% | |
| Polestar Multi-StrategyAssay-VerifiedInc. 2019-03 · Cayman Islands | +33.9% | $348M |
| ↳ MarketVector Digital Assets 100 | +77.1% | |
| Basis Trade AdvisorsAssay-VerifiedInc. 2021-01 · Singapore | +18.1% | $215M |
| ↳ Funding rate composite | -10.7% | |
| Vector Cross-ChainAccount-VerifiedInc. 2021-12 · Singapore | +17.7% | $22.0M |
| ↳ Ether (ETH) | -0.7% | |
| Catamaran HoldingsAssay-VerifiedInc. 2019-06 · Cayman Islands | +13.8% | $412M |
| ↳ 50% BTC / 50% ETH (monthly rebal) | +34.9% | |
| Orthogonal CapitalAssay-VerifiedInc. 2020-04 · Cayman Islands | +13.7% | $184M |
| ↳ T-Bill 3M (USD) | -13.0% | |
| Redbridge Market MakingAccount-VerifiedInc. 2021-10 · BVI | +13.6% | $64.0M |
| ↳ T-Bill 3M (USD) | -7.6% | |
| Ironwood PerpetualAccount-VerifiedInc. 2022-06 · BVI | +13.4% | $38.0M |
| ↳ Funding rate composite | -6.8% | |
| Kintsugi OptionsAssay-VerifiedInc. 2021-02 · BVI | +11.8% | $87.0M |
| ↳ Ether (ETH) | +27.5% | |
| Lattice Yield PartnersAccount-VerifiedInc. 2022-09 · Singapore | +11.5% | $78.0M |
| ↳ AAVE USDC supply rate | -12.3% |
A typical Assay-Verified engagement runs 14 to 28 days from kickoff to seal issuance. The five steps below describe the full lifecycle.
Strategy declared, benchmark locked in advance, in-scope accounts and wallets identified. Composite construction memo signed.
Read-only API and wallet linkage. We never custody assets, place trades, or hold withdrawal permissions on any account.
Performance computed live from the moment of engagement. Wallet-clustering and anomaly screens run continuously.
TWR per GIPS, composite construction, liquidity-adjusted valuation, gross/net reporting, disclosures drafted.
Seal granted, manager listed in the Manager Universe with locked benchmark, full risk metrics, and required disclosures.
Methodology is adapted to the strategy. A market-neutral fund and a discretionary long-only book require different benchmarks, valuation conventions, and disclosure language.
Cash-and-carry, basis trades, funding capture with minimal directional exposure.
Perpetual futures funding-rate carry, delta-hedged across venues.
Time-series and cross-sectional momentum with volatility targeting.
Stablecoin lending, structured vaults, and selective LP positioning.
Top-of-book passive quoting and inventory-neutral spread capture.
Discretionary or systematic long/short with single-name shorts hedged.
Variance carry, skew trades, and term-structure relative-value via options.
Inter-chain dislocations across EVM L2s, Solana, Bitcoin, Cosmos, Sui, Aptos.
Multi-factor systematic strategies with composite risk targeting.
Concentrated books built on protocol-economics and on-chain primary research.
The infrastructure that makes rigorous verification operationally feasible at low marginal cost — built for 24/7 markets, multi-venue execution, and on-chain settlement.
Read-only API connections to 20+ centralized venues. Trade and transfer history reconstructed from primary sources.
Wallet and vault tracking across Ethereum, EVM L2s, Solana, Bitcoin, Cosmos, Sui, and Aptos.
Time-Weighted Return computation per GIPS, daily marks, composite construction, gross/net reporting.
BTC, ETH, BITW, CD20, MarketVector, T-Bills, AAVE rates, custom blends — locked at engagement.
VWAP across qualifying venues plus a haircut on positions exceeding ADV concentration thresholds.
Continuous wallet-clustering and return-distribution screens. Suspicious patterns held aside for review.
Time-bound, watermarked manager tear sheets shared with prospective allocators. No raw trade exposure.
Read endpoints for the Manager Universe — for FoFs, family offices, and platform integrations.
Design partners — coming soon
For Managers
For emerging crypto managers, the Assay-Verified seal is often the single largest source of inbound LP discovery. Family offices browse the Universe specifically for managers whose returns have been independently verified.
Engage AssayFor Allocators
Discover crypto managers whose returns have been independently verified to GIPS-aligned methodology, with locked-in benchmarks tracked from day one — and a single methodology layer across the entire universe.
Request accessAssay follows the CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards, adapted for digital assets — 24/7 markets, on-chain settlement, illiquid token valuation, and custody verification.
Read our methodologyQuestions we get from CIOs, allocators, and managers as they evaluate engagement. The methodology answers here are the ones that should determine whether Assay is the right partner.
Copy-trading platforms make a manager's trades public so others can replicate them. This destroys the value of any strategy with finite capacity — front-running and replication erode the edge. Assay does the opposite: we verify the result of a strategy without exposing the strategy itself. Managers can prove their returns are real, methodologically sound, and consistent with a pre-declared benchmark, while keeping their signals, models, and trade-level decisions private.
Performance is computed using Time-Weighted Return (TWR) per GIPS methodology, which is specifically designed to neutralize external cash flows. Any deposit into the manager's account is treated as a contribution and excluded from performance; any withdrawal is treated as a distribution. Performance reflects only the change in value of capital while it was deployed.
Beyond TWR, we require pre-declaration of all wallets the manager controls at engagement scoping. Wallet-clustering analysis (similar to Chainalysis/Arkham methodology) runs continuously to detect deposits from wallets that exhibit behavior consistent with related-party flows — wallets that share funding sources, transact in patterns suggesting common control, or appear connected through shared infrastructure. Any flow flagged by clustering analysis is held aside and reviewed before being treated as a genuine external contribution.
This is the most important methodological question in crypto verification, and it doesn't apply in traditional finance. A manager running a strategy in a thinly-traded token can in principle manipulate their own mark — they hold a position, place small buy orders near the end of a reporting period to nudge the price up, and report inflated returns on a position they couldn't actually exit at the marked price.
We have three layers of defense:
1. Volume-weighted average pricing across venues, not single-venue last-print. Position marks use VWAP across all liquid venues over a window (typically the trailing 4 hours of the reporting period) rather than the closing tick on any single venue. This neutralizes most close-of-period spoofing.
2. Liquidity-adjusted valuation haircuts.If a manager holds $10M of a token with $500K daily volume, marking the full position at market price is fiction — they couldn't exit at that price. GIPS already requires “fair value” valuation. We operationalize this by applying a haircut to illiquid positions based on days-to-liquidate at realistic market impact. This is what serious crypto funds already do internally; we make it standard and auditable.
3. Position concentration disclosure.Any position larger than 5% of the token's average daily volume or 10% of the manager's AUM is flagged in the verification report. LPs see the concentration. They can decide what to make of it.
This is exactly the kind of methodological adaptation that justifies a crypto-specific verifier. GIPS requires “fair value”; we operationalize fair value for assets that trade 24/7 across fifty venues with wildly varying liquidity.
Benchmarks fall into three categories:
Beta-style — BTC, ETH, large-cap indices (Bitwise BITW, MarketVector, CoinDesk 20), and sector indices (DeFi Pulse, metaverse, infrastructure).
Strategy-style— for market-neutral strategies, T-Bills + spread; for funding-rate trades, the published funding rate of the manager's primary venue; for DeFi yield, the AAVE or Compound stablecoin lending rate over the reporting period.
Custom blended— a manager may declare a blended benchmark at engagement (e.g., “50% BTC, 50% ETH, monthly rebalanced”) and is then locked to it for the duration of the engagement.
The critical methodological point: the benchmark is declared in advance and locked at engagement scoping, timestamped at the moment of commitment. A manager cannot retroactively change benchmark to flatter their returns. This is straight from GIPS Provision 4.A.1; our innovation is enforcing it cryptographically rather than relying on the manager's documentation discipline.
Risk-adjusted metrics are computed from the same TWR series used for return reporting, against the same locked-in benchmark, using the standard CFA Institute definitions. Sharpe uses the risk-free rate appropriate to the reporting currency (3-month T-Bills for USD-denominated composites, 3-month German Bunds for EUR, etc.). Sortino uses the minimum acceptable return defined at engagement (typically risk-free or zero). Calmar uses max drawdown over the trailing 36 months.
Importantly, we report metrics over GIPS-standard horizons: 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, 10Y annualized. Strategies with less than 12 months of verified history do not receive an annualized Sharpe — only the verified period return is shown. We do not extrapolate or annualize short tracks.
No. We see your trades and on-chain positions in order to verify performance, but the verification report we publish contains only the performance series, risk metrics, declared benchmark, composite construction notes, and required GIPS-aligned disclosures. The trades themselves are never published, never sold to third parties, never used to train models, and never visible to LPs browsing the Manager Universe. Internal access to manager trade data is logged and limited to the verification team.
Self-Reported listings are free. Account-Verified is a monthly subscription. Assay-Verified is an annual engagement fee plus a monthly maintenance fee, with pricing scaled to AUM. We publish pricing only to engaged prospects; contact us to discuss your specific situation.
No. GIPS® is a registered trademark of CFA Institute. Assay is not affiliated with CFA Institute. We follow the public GIPS standards as our methodological reference, the same way independent GIPS verification firms in traditional finance (ACA Group, Confluence Technologies, Alpha FMC) follow GIPS without being arms of CFA Institute. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant Assay's services.
Typical Assay-Verified engagement is 14–28 days from kickoff to seal issuance. Account-Verified onboarding is usually under a week. Self-Reported is immediate.
20+ centralized exchanges including Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, Bybit, OKX, Deribit, Bitfinex, BitMEX, Bitget, KuCoin, Gate.io, MEXC, dYdX, GMX, and the major derivatives venues. On-chain support spans Ethereum and all major EVM L2s, Solana, Bitcoin, Cosmos chains, Sui, and Aptos. Custody integrations with Fireblocks, BitGo, Anchorage, Copper, Ledger Enterprise.